Well, we have hand hewn log cabins from the 1700s and the wood that has been messed with looks much worse than the natural logs. The exterior (untouched) logs weathered to a beautiful grey and the original-ish, or at least what is left of the least damaged interior logs were covered with white wash which is just a thin mixture of hydrated lime mixed with water, I think. Very beautiful.
The dark stained walls turned a nasty dark brown and the varnished walls a bilious yellow.
My opinion is that your logs would look better left alone, or washed with a thin coating of milk paint or plaster. Hand hewn logs are so beautiful there is no need for stain.
However, you have probably already done whatever your plan is!
Well, good question about the grey. What kind of wood do you have? Looks like pine to me, i.e. "knotty pine" on account of the many dark areas that appear to be left from where branches were. Our logs are oak, with no visible marks from branches. Maybe cedar? Cedar can also have branch marks. Had your the logs been left out in the sun, I would say a season, however inside I don't know. You may have to stain them after all. I say live with them as is for a while - you can always stain later. Also remember that dark colors make the house darker inside - maybe that doesn't matter to you.
Thanks for the pics!
Sponsored
Reload the page to not see this specific ad anymore
Houzz uses cookies and similar technologies to personalise my experience, serve me relevant content, and improve Houzz products and services. By clicking ‘Accept’ I agree to this, as further described in the Houzz Cookie Policy. I can reject non-essential cookies by clicking ‘Manage Preferences’.
Montana Reclaimed Lumber Co.
northface99
Jodie MeadowcroftOriginal Author
northface99